Scientific Reports · 2023 · 14 citations · 52 references
Health ProfessionsAudiologyClinical AudiologyDiagnostic AudiologyHearing AssessmentAdult Audiologic EvaluationAdult Diagnostic AudiologyAdult Hearing AssessmentAudiologic EvaluationHearing ImpairmentHearing LossAdult Hearing ScreeningAuditory Processing ScreeningDiagnostic AudiometryDichotic Digits TestDichotic SpeechGold Standard AssessmentHearing Impairment IdentificationHearing Screening
Hearing thresholds form the gold standard assessment in Audiology clinics. However, ~ 10% of adult patients seeking audiological care for self-perceived hearing deficits have thresholds that are normal. Currently, a diagnostic assessment for auditory processing disorder (APD) remains one of the few viable avenues of further care for this patient population, yet there are no standard guidelines for referrals. Here, we identified tests within the APD testing battery that could provide a rapid screener to inform APD referrals in adults. We first analyzed records from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Audiology database to identify adult patients with self-perceived hearing difficulties despite normal audiometric thresholds. We then looked at the patients who were referred for APD testing. We examined test performances, correlational relationships, and classification accuracies. Patients experienced most difficulties within the dichotic domain of testing. Additionally, accuracies calculated from sensitivities and specificities revealed the words-in-noise (WIN), the Random Dichotic Digits Task (RDDT) and Quick Speech in Noise (QuickSIN) tests had the highest classification accuracies. The addition of these tests have the greatest promise as a quick screener during routine audiological assessments to help identify adult patients who may be referred for APD assessment and resulting treatment plans.
52
Arnold Starr, Terence W. Picton, Yvonnc Sininger et al. · Brain · 1996 · 972 citations · Full text
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +17