PLoS ONE · 2023 · 16 citations · 12 references
Public HealthInfectious DiseasesAntimicrobial ResistanceDiagnostic MicrobiologyTuberculosis ControlDrug-susceptible Tuberculosis TreatmentMycobacterial DiagnosticsPulmonary TuberculosisTuberculosis DiagnosisTuberculosis Diagnostic TestingTuberculosis EpidemiologyDiagnostic Testing AccuracyDrug Resistance TestingIsoniazid Resistance TestingMolecular Drug Susceptibility TestingMycobacterium Tuberculosis InfectionPhenotypic Drug Susceptibility TestingRifampicin Resistance TestingTuberculosis Drug Resistance
BACKGROUND: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (DR-TB) is one of the major challenges to TB control. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a blinded, laboratory-based cross-sectional study using sputum samples or culture isolates. Samples were from patients with rifampicin-resistant-TB and/or with high risk for isoniazid (INH) resistance and/or 2nd line fluoroquinolones (FQ) and injectable agents (IAs). The diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert® MTB/XDR test was compared to MGIT960 and the Hain Genotype® MTBDRplus and MDRsl assays (LPA) as reference DST methods. Factors for laboratory uptake of the Xpert® MTB/XDR test were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 100 stored sputum samples included in this study, 65/99 (65.6%) were resistant to INH, 5/100 (5.0%) were resistant to FQ and none were resistant to IAs using MGIT960. The sensitivity and specificity, n (%; 95% Confidence Interval, CI) of Xpert® MTB/XDR test for; INH was 58 (89.2; 79.1-95.5) and 30 (88.2; 72.5-96.6) and for FQ; 4 (80.0; 28.3-99.4) and 95 (100; 96.2-100), respectively. Using LPA as a reference standard, a total of 52/98 (53.1%) were resistant to INH, 3/100 (3.0%) to FQ, and none to IA. The sensitivity and specificity, n (%; 95%CI) of Xpert® MTB/XDR test compared to LPA for; INH was 50 (96.1; 86.7-99.5) and 34 (74.0; 58.8-85.7) for FQ 3 (100; 29.2-100) and 96 (99.0; 94.3-99.9) respectively. The factors for laboratory uptake and roll-out of the Xpert® MTB/XDR test included: no training needed for technicians with, and one day for those without, previous Xpert-ultra experience, recording and reporting needs were not different from those of Xpert-ultra, the error rate was 4/100 (4%), one (1%) indeterminate rate and test turn-around-time were 1hr/45 minutes. CONCLUSION: There is high sensitivity and specificity of Xpert® MTB/XDR test for isoniazid and fluoroquinolones. There are acceptable Xpert® MTB/XDR test attributes for the test uptake and roll-out.
12
Adam Penn‐Nicholson, Sophia B. Georghiou, Nelly Ciobanu et al. · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2021 · 94 citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology +14
Gabriela Torrea, Kamela C. S. Ng, Armand Van Deun et al. · Scientific Reports · 2019 · 56 citations · Full text
Esther Y. Hsiang, Kristen Little, Priscilla Haguma et al. · The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2016 · 45 citations