IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2023 · 34 citations · 49 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionMachine LearningRemote SensingDeep LearningHyperspectral ImagingImage ClassificationPattern RecognitionRemote Sensing Image AnalysisRepresentation LearningConvolutional Neural NetworksHyperspectral AnalysisHyperspectral ClassificationHyperspectral Feature ExtractionHyperspectral Image ClassificationHyperspectral Image ProcessingReceptive Field SizeRemote Sensing Image Features
In the past, deep learning (DL) technologies have been widely used in hyperspectral image classification tasks. Among them, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) use fixed size receptive field (RF) to obtain spectral and spatial features of hyperspectral images (HSIs), showing great feature extraction capabilities, which are one of the most popular DL frameworks. However, the convolution using local extraction and global parameter sharing mechanism pays more attention to spatial content information, which changes the spectral sequence information in the learned features. In addition, CNN is difficult to describe the long-distance correlation between HSI pixels and bands. To solve these problems, a spectral-spatial fusion Transformer network (S <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> FTNet) is proposed for the classification of hyperspectral images. Specifically, S <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> FTNet adopts the Transformer framework to build a spatial Transformer module (SpaFormer) and a spectral Transformer module (SpeFormer) to capture image spatial and spectral long-distance dependencies. In addition, an adaptive spectral-spatial fusion mechanism (AS <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> FM) is proposed to effectively fuse the obtained advanced high-level semantic features. Finally, a large number of experiments were carried out on four datasets, Indian Pines, Pavia, Salinas and WHU-Hi-LongKou, which verified that the proposed S <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> FTNet can provide better classification performance than other the state-of-the-art networks.
49
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 222.1K citations · Full text
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Jie Hu, Li Shen, Samuel Albanie et al. · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2019 · 12.5K citations
Dual Attention Network for Scene Segmentation
Jun Fu, Jing Liu, Haijie Tian et al. · 2019 · 6.8K citations