The Astrophysical Journal · 2023 · 10 citations · 97 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsExtragalactic AstronomyX-ray AstronomyBlack HolesExtragalactic X-ray SourcesAccretion Rate VariabilityBlack Hole Mass MeasurementsEddington Accretion RateReverberation MappingSpectral Flux DensitySuper-eddington AccretionX-ray Variability Amplitude
Abstract We report strong and rapid X-ray variability found from the super-Eddington accreting quasar SDSS J081456.10+532533.5 at z = 0.1197. It has a black hole mass of 2.7 × 10 7 M ⊙ and a dimensionless accretion rate of ≈4 measured from reverberation-mapping observations. It showed weak X-ray emission in the 2021 February Chandra observation, with the 2 keV flux density being <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>9.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> times lower compared to an archival Swift observation. The 2 keV flux density is also <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>11.7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6.3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> times weaker compared to the expectation from its optical/UV emission. In a follow-up XMM-Newton observation 32 days later, the 2 keV flux density increased by a factor of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>5.3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6.4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , and the spectra are best described by a power law modified with partial-covering absorption; the absorption-corrected intrinsic continuum is at a nominal flux level. Nearly simultaneous optical spectra reveal no variability, and there is only mild long-term optical/infrared variability from archival data (with a maximum variability amplitude of ≈50%). We interpret the X-ray variability with an obscuration scenario, where the intrinsic X-ray continuum does not vary but the absorber has a variable column density and covering factor along the line of sight. The absorber is likely the small-scale clumpy accretion wind that has been proposed to be responsible for similar X-ray variability in other super-Eddington accreting quasars.
97
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2020 · 14.1K citations · Full text
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
Michael F. Skrutskie, R. M. Cutri, R. Stiening et al. · The Astronomical Journal · 2006 · 12.2K citations · Full text
The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The pn-CCD camera
L. Strüder, U. G. Briel, K. Dennerl et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2001 · 3K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +17