Journal of Clinical Immunology · 2023 · 11 citations · 18 references
PharmacyPharmacokineticsPharmacologyClinical PharmacologyDosage Form DesignImmunotherapyDose OptimizationImmunosuppressionImmunosuppression ManagementImmunotherapy SafetyPharmacokinetics Of ImmunotherapiesInfusion DurationInfusion Rate ModificationInfusion SafetyMaximum Flow RatePatient Experience EvaluationPharmacokinetic Study DesignPrimary Immunodeficiency DisordersSubcutaneous Immunoglobulin
PURPOSE: To achieve reductions in infusion time, infusion sites, and frequency, a prospective, open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) 16.5% (Cutaquig®, Octapharma) at enhanced infusion regimens. METHODS: Three separate cohorts received SCIG 16.5% evaluating volume, rate, and frequency: Cohort 1) volume assessment/site: up to a maximum 100 mL/site; Cohort 2) infusion flow rate/site: up to a maximum of 100 mL/hr/site or the maximum flow rate achievable by the tubing; Cohort 3) infusion frequency: every other week at twice the patient's weekly dose. RESULTS: For Cohort 1 (n = 15), the maximum realized volume per site was 108 mL/site, exceeding the currently labeled (US) maximum (up to 40 mL/site for adults). In Cohort 2 (n = 15), the maximum realized infusion flow rate was 67.5 mL/hr/site which is also higher than the labeled (US) maximum (up to 52 mL/hr/site). In Cohort 3 (n = 34), the mean total trough levels for every other week dosing demonstrated equivalency to weekly dosing (p value = 0.0017). All regimens were well tolerated. There were no serious bacterial infections (SBIs). Most patients had mild (23.4%) or moderate (56.3%) adverse events. The majority of patients found the new infusion regimens to be better or somewhat better than their previous regimens and reported that switching to SCIG 16.5% was easy. CONCLUSIONS: SCIG 16.5% (Cutaquig®), infusions are efficacious, safe, and well tolerated with reduced infusion time, fewer infusion sites, and reduced frequency. Further, the majority of patients found the new infusion regimens to be better or somewhat better than their previous regimens.
18
Stuart G. Tangye, Waleed Al–Herz, Aziz Bousfiha et al. · Journal of Clinical Immunology · 2020 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Genetics, Immunology +16
Stuart G. Tangye, Waleed Al–Herz, Aziz Bousfiha et al. · Journal of Clinical Immunology · 2022 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Genetics, Immunology +14
Common variable immunodeficiency disorders: division into distinct clinical phenotypes
Helen Chapel, Mary Lucas, Martin Lee et al. · Blood · 2008 · 822 citations · Full text
H.W. Eijkhout, J.W.M. van der Meer, Cees G. M. Kallenberg et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2001 · 238 citations