Briefings in Functional Genomics · 2023 · 17 citations · 40 references
MedicineCancer BiologyOncologyMachine LearningNeuro-oncologyTumor HeterogeneityGlioblastomaMolecular Classification Of TumorsSingle-cell Rna Sequencing AnalysisSingle-cell TranscriptomicsTranscriptomic HeterogeneityTumor ClassificationCancer Heterogeneity AnalysisCore-periphery ModelsGlioblastoma Molecular SubtypesGlioblastoma Tumor BiologyHeterogeneityIntratumoral DiversityMulti-class ApplicationsSingle-cell Rna Sequencing
Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing all fields that affect people's lives and health. One of the most critical applications is in the study of tumors. It is the case of glioblastoma (GBM) that has behaviors that need to be understood to develop effective therapies. Due to advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), it is possible to understand the cellular and molecular heterogeneity in the GBM. Given that there are different cell groups in these tumors, there is a need to apply Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. It will allow extracting information to understand how cancer changes and broaden the search for effective treatments. We proposed multiple comparisons of ML algorithms to classify cell groups based on the GBM scRNA-seq data. This broad comparison spectrum can show the scientific-medical community which models can achieve the best performance in this task. In this work are classified the following cell groups: Tumor Core (TC), Tumor Periphery (TP) and Normal Periphery (NP), in binary and multi-class scenarios. This work presents the biomarker candidates found for the models with the best results. The analyses presented here allow us to verify the biomarker candidates to understand the genetic characteristics of GBM, which may be affected by a suitable identification of GBM heterogeneity. This work obtained for the four scenarios covered cross-validation results of $93.03\% \pm 5.37\%$, $97.42\% \pm 3.94\%$, $98.27\% \pm 1.81\%$ and $93.04\% \pm 6.88\%$ for the classification of TP versus TC, TP versus NP, NP versus TP and TC (TPC) and NP versus TP versus TC, respectively.
40
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Fabián Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 63.7K citations · Full text
Laurens van der Maaten, Geoffrey E. Hinton · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2008 · 35.7K citations
SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique
Nitesh V. Chawla, Kevin W. Bowyer, Lawrence Hall et al. · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · 2002 · 31.2K citations · Full text
Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Roger Stupp, Warren Mason, Martin J. van den Bent et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 21.6K citations · Full text
Pierre Geurts, Damien Ernst, Louis Wehenkel · Machine Learning · 2006 · 8.7K citations · Full text