European Urology Open Science · 2023 · 16 citations · 25 references
MedicineSurgeryUrologyPediatric SurgeryPediatric UrologyPerioperative SafetyLaparoscopic Renal SurgeryLaparoscopic SurgeryMinimally Invasive Urologic SurgeryPediatric Urologic SurgeryRobot-assisted SurgerySurgical RoboticsClinical Pathway DesignClinical Pathway ImplementationDay Surgery UtilizationHospital Stay DurationRetroperitoneal ApproachRobot-assisted PyeloplastySurgical TraumaSurgical Urology
Background: Robot-assisted pyeloplasty is the most frequently performed robotic procedure in children. A retroperitoneal approach limits surgical trauma and avoids peritoneal irritation. This led to the establishment of the criteria for day surgery (DS) and a related clinical care pathway. Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of DS in children undergoing retroperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (R-RALP). Design setting and participants: We performed a bicentric prospective study (NCT03274050) over 2 yr involving the two major paediatric urology teaching hospitals in Paris. A clinical pathway and a prospective research protocol were specifically established. Intervention: DS in selected children undergoing R-RALP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcomes were DS failure, 30-d complications, and readmission rates. The secondary outcomes included preoperative characteristics, perioperative parameters, and surgical outcomes. Quantitative variables were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges. Results and limitations: = 1). The median duration of hospital stay of the 26 children in the DS setting was 12.7 h (12.2-13.2). During the 30-d period, there were four emergency room visits (15%) resulting in two patients requiring readmission (8%): one for febrile urinary tract infection (Clavien-Dindo II) and one child with no JJ stent for urinoma (Clavien-Dindo IIIb). Radiological studies confirmed improvement in dilatation for all cases with no recurrence (median follow-up: 15 mo). Conclusions: This prospective case series is the first to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of DS in children undergoing R-RALP, obviating the need for routine inpatient care. Excellent results can be achieved by careful patient selection, a clear clinical pathway, and a dedicated team. Further evaluation is warranted to assess the cost effectiveness. Patient summary: This study shows that day surgery after robotic pyeloplasty is both safe and effective in selected children.
25
Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children
David S. Yee, Allan M. Shanberg, Barry P. Duel et al. · Urology · 2006 · 170 citations
Medicine, Pediatrics, Surgery +13
Briony K. Varda, Ye Wang, Benjamin I. Chung et al. · Journal of Pediatric Urology · 2018 · 124 citations · Full text