Environmental DNA · 2023 · 56 citations · 67 references
Life SciencesBiologyPlant BiologyBiodiversity MonitoringInsect BiodiversityInsect EcologyEnvironmental Dna SurveyingInsect Life History EcologyInsect MonitoringPest DetectionPest EcologyPlant-insect InteractionsArthropod Diversity MonitoringArthropod Parasite DiversityArthropod Pest IdentificationEnvironmental Dna (Edna)Environmental Dna (Edna) MonitoringEnvironmental Dna DetectionEnvironmental Dna MetabarcodingMetabarcoding Analysis
Abstract Arthropods can strongly impact ecosystems through pollination, herbivory, predation, and parasitism. As such, characterizing arthropod biodiversity is vital to understanding ecosystem health, functions, and services. Emerging environmental DNA (eDNA) methods targeting trace arthropod eDNA left behind on flowers have the potential to track arthropod biodiversity and interactions. The goal of this study was to determine the extent to which eDNA metabarcoding can identify plant‐arthropod and arthropod‐arthropod interactions and assess eDNA metabarcoding compared to conventional sampling. We deployed camera traps to document arthropod activity on specific flowers, sampled eDNA from those same flowers, then performed a metabarcoding analysis that targets a partial fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) to determine all arthropod eDNA present. We found that our eDNA metabarcoding analysis detected small arthropod pollinators, plant pests, and parasites, and shed light on potential predator–prey interactions while detecting 55 species compared to just 21 species from conventional camera trapping. The camera trapping survey, however, detected larger, more conspicuous nectarivores more successfully. We also explored the ecology of residual arthropod eDNA, finding that rainfall had a significant negative effect on the ability to detect residual arthropod eDNA. Preliminary evidence also indicates flower species may impact the amount of arthropod eDNA that can be detected. We found that eDNA metabarcoding can provide clues to potential predator–prey interactions on flowers and highlights the potential insights that can be gained from future eDNA metabarcoding studies. We show that eDNA metabarcoding is a valuable tool for not only detecting pollinator communities but for revealing potential interactions among plants, pollinators, pests, parasites, and predators. Future research should focus on how to improve the detection of large pollinators/nectivores and studying the ecology of residual arthropod eDNA to further explore this method's utility.
67
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2000 · 353K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Statistical Computing +10
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using <b>lme4</b>
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker et al. · Journal of Statistical Software · 2015 · 85.6K citations · Full text
DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
Benjamin J. Callahan, Paul J. McMurdie, Michael Rosen et al. · Nature Methods · 2016 · 36.3K citations
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
Marcel Martin · EMBnet journal · 2011 · 35.8K citations · Full text