Longitudinal detection of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Arnab Basu, Revathi Kollipara, Sumedha Sudhaman, Tamara Mahmood, Natalia Pajak, Carcia Carson, Punashi Dutta, Mark Calhoun, Adam ElNaggar, Minetta C. Liu,

Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2023 · 12 citations · 0 references

Concepts

Abstract

715 Background: Treatment response monitoring is key to effective disease management for patients with advanced (RCC) and can potentially improve clinical outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown promise as a biomarker in the early identification of treatment response in a variety of tumor types. Herein, we evaluated ctDNA-derived molecular residual disease (MRD) detection and dynamics in both clear cell (ccRCC) and non-clear cell (nccRCC) RCC patients treated with standard of care therapy and provide correlations with clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a multi-center retrospective analysis of real-world data obtained from commercial ctDNA testing (Signatera, Natera, Inc.), 41 patients (142 plasma samples) with high-risk resected or metastatic RCC were analyzed for ctDNA. Clinical data were collected on IMDC risk category, pathologic subtype, tumor stage and grade including the presence of sarcomatoid/rhabdoid features. Progression on radiological imaging was based on RECIST 1.1. criteria. Results: Of the 41 patients, 73% (30/41) had ccRCC and the remaining 27% (11/41) were nccRCC. Immunotherapy was administered as a single agent or in combination with other immune checkpoint inhibitor agents/targeted therapy in 78% (32/41) in either frontline or refractory settings. ctDNA detection at any time point was 70% (29/41) and patients were followed-up for a median of 26.4 weeks (range: 0.9-90.6) from the first ctDNA time point. Fourteen patients (34%) experienced disease progression during follow-up and all had ctDNA detected ahead of radiological progression (100% sensitivity) with a median lead time of 13.6 weeks (range: 1-39.7 weeks). Concordance between clinical outcome and ctDNA status (detected or not detected) was observed in 78% (32/41) of the patients, 12% (5/41) showed discordance, and imaging data is pending for 10% (4/41) at the time of analysis. Conclusions: Collectively, our study demonstrates high concordance between MRD status and subsequent clinical outcomes. MRD had 100% sensitivity for predicting subsequent radiographic progression with significant median lead time. MRD may serve as a valuable tool for monitoring patients on immunotherapy-based regimens for RCC.