Scientific Reports · 2023 · 36 citations · 23 references
MedicineComputer ScienceGynecologyArtificial IntelligenceUltrasonographyUltrasoundComputer-aided DiagnosisMedical Image AnalysisMedical ImagingUterine ImagingUterine UltrasonographyUterine UltrasoundAccuracyArtificial Intelligence-assisted DiagnosisComparative Diagnostic PerformanceDiagnostic Performance MetricsExternal Validation CohortsFibroid DiagnosisInternal ValidationUterine Fibroid Evaluation
We explored a new artificial intelligence-assisted method to assist junior ultrasonographers in improving the diagnostic performance of uterine fibroids and further compared it with senior ultrasonographers to confirm the effectiveness and feasibility of the artificial intelligence method. In this retrospective study, we collected a total of 3870 ultrasound images from 667 patients with a mean age of 42.45 years ± 6.23 [SD] for those who received a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of uterine fibroids and 570 women with a mean age of 39.24 years ± 5.32 [SD] without uterine lesions from Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University between 2015 and 2020. The DCNN model was trained and developed on the training dataset (2706 images) and internal validation dataset (676 images). To evaluate the performance of the model on the external validation dataset (488 images), we assessed the diagnostic performance of the DCNN with ultrasonographers possessing different levels of seniority. The DCNN model aided the junior ultrasonographers (Averaged) in diagnosing uterine fibroids with higher accuracy (94.72% vs. 86.63%, P < 0.001), sensitivity (92.82% vs. 83.21%, P = 0.001), specificity (97.05% vs. 90.80%, P = 0.009), positive predictive value (97.45% vs. 91.68%, P = 0.007), and negative predictive value (91.73% vs. 81.61%, P = 0.001) than they achieved alone. Their ability was comparable to that of senior ultrasonographers (Averaged) in terms of accuracy (94.72% vs. 95.24%, P = 0.66), sensitivity (92.82% vs. 93.66%, P = 0.73), specificity (97.05% vs. 97.16%, P = 0.79), positive predictive value (97.45% vs. 97.57%, P = 0.77), and negative predictive value (91.73% vs. 92.63%, P = 0.75). The DCNN-assisted strategy can considerably improve the uterine fibroid diagnosis performance of junior ultrasonographers to make them more comparable to senior ultrasonographers.
23
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 222.1K citations · Full text
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher et al. · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2009 · 61.8K citations
Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction from Primary Breast Cancer US Images Using Deep Learning
Liqiang Zhou, Xinglong Wu, Shuyan Huang et al. · Radiology · 2019 · 396 citations · Full text
Deep Learning for Automated Contouring of Primary Tumor Volumes by MRI for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Li Lin, Qi Dou, Yueming Jin et al. · Radiology · 2019 · 346 citations