Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2022 · 15 citations · 28 references
MedicineNephrologyRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyChronic Kidney DiseaseDiffusion ImagingFibrosisRenal DiseaseRenal FibrosisRenal ImagingApparent Diffusion Coefficient AnalysisCkd ProgressionCkd StagingDiffusion Spectrum ImagingDiffusivityDisease Progression MonitoringInterstitial Fibrosis MonitoringNoninvasive Diagnostics
Background Renal interstitial fibrosis is one of the most common pathways in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Noninvasive evaluation of interstitial fibrosis would help monitoring CKD progression and prognosis prediction. Purpose To evaluate the severity of renal interstitial fibrosis by diffusion‐relaxation correlation spectrum imaging (DR‐CSI). Study Type Prospective. Subjects Forty patients with CKD and 10 healthy controls (average age 49.2 ± 14.8 years, 18 females). Field Strength/Sequence 3‐T, DR‐CSI with 36 axial spin‐echo echo‐planar diffusion‐weighted images (6 b ‐values, 6 echo times). Assessment Interstitial fibrosis level (IFL) was assessed from biopsy results (IFL = 1, fibrosis percentage <25%, defined as mild; IFL = 2, 25%–50%, moderate; IFL = 3, >50%, severe). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using serum creatinine. The regions of interest included cortex for both kidneys. The diffusivity‐T2 spectrum was assessed considering three compartments (threshold: T2 30–40 msec, diffusivity 5–9 μm 2 /msec, according to visible peaks): A (low diffusivity, short T2), B (low diffusivity, long T2), and C (high diffusivity). Volume fractions V i ( i = A , B , C ) were calculated. Statistical Tests Intra‐class coefficient (ICC, >0.6 as good) to assess inter‐reader agreement of DR‐CSI V i . Spearman's correlation to assess relationship of V i to IFL and eGFR. Receiver operating characteristic analyses with the area under the curve (AUC) to discriminate patients with moderate‐severe fibrosis from mild ones. Statistical significance criteria: P ‐value <0.05. Results ICCs were good for all V i . Correlations were found between IFL and V B ( r = 0.424, significant) and V C ( r = −0.400, significant), and between eGFR and V B ( r = −0.303, P = 0.058) and V C ( r = 0.487, significant). Regarding V B and V C , the AUCs were 0.903 and 0.824. Data Conclusion DR‐CSI help distinguish patients with moderate or severe renal interstitial fibrosis from mild ones. Evidence Level: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2
28
<i>In vivo</i> visualization of myelin water in brain by magnetic resonance
Alex L. MacKay, Kenneth P. Whittall, Julian Adler et al. · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 1994 · 924 citations
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +17
Renal diffusion and BOLD MRI in experimental diabetic nephropathy
Mario Ries, F. Basseau, B. Tyndal et al. · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2002 · 229 citations
Medicine, Pathology, Physiology +17
Assessment of renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease using diffusion-weighted MRI
Jingbo Zhao, Z.J. Wang, M. Liu et al. · Clinical Radiology · 2014 · 152 citations
Medicine, Nephrology, Radiology +16