Ethics & Behavior · 2022 · 13 citations · 57 references
History Of ScienceHealth PolicyScielo Brazil CollectionScientific IntegrityBibliometricsScholarly CommunicationRetracted ArticlesResearch MisconductResearch EthicsPost-retraction CitationsPublic HealthArtsScientific MisconductCitation AnalysisScientific Paper MillsJournalismImpact Factor
This paper investigates retracted articles indexed in the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) Brazil, using bibliometric techniques to identify the characteristics of these retractions and relevant citation trends. All records of retracted articles from the first record in October 2004 to April 2022 were included. Sixty-seven retractions and 870 citations pre- and post-retraction were analyzed. Results indicate a change of scenario that began in 2015, with recurrences of retracted articles allegedly produced by paper mills. The prevalence of retractions derived from professional misconduct in health research and the frequency of post-retraction citations in health sciences raise concerns in the chain of stakeholders, public health, and scientific development.
57
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
Vincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein, Philippe Mongeon · PLoS ONE · 2015 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Digital Business, Law, Bibliometrics +17
Web of Science and Scopus language coverage
Miguel-Ãngel Vera-Baceta, Kayvan Kousha · Scientometrics · 2019 · 345 citations · Full text