UNC Libraries · 2021 · 20 citations · 0 references
MedicineBiomedical InformaticsNeurologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingImaging InformaticsComputer-aided DiagnosisImage SegmentationImaging Data ManagementMedical Image AnalysisMultiple SclerosisVolume SegmentationComputerized Image AnalysisData Management PlatformsLesion DetectionLesion SegmentationMedical Image SegmentationObjective EvaluationSegmentation EvaluationSegmentation Model Evaluation
The study evaluates multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation algorithms at the MICCAI 2016 challenge. An open‑science computing infrastructure automatically assessed thirteen segmentation methods on 53 cases from four centers, each manually annotated by seven experts. Automatic algorithms, including machine‑learning approaches, still lag behind human experts in detection and delineation, though a consensus of algorithms improves segmentation accuracy toward expert performance.
We present a study of multiple sclerosis segmentation algorithms conducted at the international MICCAI 2016 challenge. This challenge was operated using a new open-science computing infrastructure. This allowed for the automatic and independent evaluation of a large range of algorithms in a fair and completely automatic manner. This computing infrastructure was used to evaluate thirteen methods of MS lesions segmentation, exploring a broad range of state-of-theart algorithms, against a high-quality database of 53 MS cases coming from four centers following a common definition of the acquisition protocol. Each case was annotated manually by an unprecedented number of seven different experts. Results of the challenge highlighted that automatic algorithms, including the recent machine learning methods (random forests, deep learning, …), are still trailing human expertise on both detection and delineation criteria. In addition, we demonstrate that computing a statistically robust consensus of the algorithms performs closer to human expertise on one score (segmentation) although still trailing on detection scores.