Publication | Open Access
Regional Neuroanatomic Effects on Brain Age Inferred Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ridge Regression
15
Citations
41
References
2022
Year
NeuropsychologyAgingBrain FunctionBrain DevelopmentDevelopmental Cognitive NeuroscienceBrain LesionLongitudinal NeuroimagingSocial SciencesGeriatric NeurologyAlzheimer's DiseaseBiostatisticsNeurologyNeuropathologyCognitive NeuroscienceBrain StructureNeural AgingNeuroimagingCerebral Blood FlowBrain ImagingNeurological AssessmentNeuroimaging BiomarkersCognitive PerformanceChronological AgeDementiaRegional Neuroanatomic EffectsHuman NeuroscienceNeuroscienceRidge RegressionBrain AgeMedicine
The biological age of the brain differs from its chronological age (CA) and can be used as biomarker of neural/cognitive disease processes and as predictor of mortality. Brain age (BA) is often estimated from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) using machine learning (ML) that rarely indicates how regional brain features contribute to BA. Leveraging an aggregate training sample of 3 418 healthy controls (HCs), we describe a ridge regression model that quantifies each region's contribution to BA. After model testing on an independent sample of 651 HCs, we compute the coefficient of partial determination R¯p2 for each regional brain volume to quantify its contribution to BA. Model performance is also evaluated using the correlation r between chronological and biological ages, the mean absolute error (MAE ) and mean squared error (MSE) of BA estimates. On training data, r=0.92, MSE=70.94 years, MAE=6.57 years, and R¯2=0.81; on test data, r=0.90, MSE=81.96 years, MAE=7.00 years, and R¯2=0.79. The regions whose volumes contribute most to BA are the nucleus accumbens (R¯p2=7.27%), inferior temporal gyrus (R¯p2=4.03%), thalamus (R¯p2=3.61%), brainstem (R¯p2=3.29%), posterior lateral sulcus (R¯p2=3.22%), caudate nucleus (R¯p2=3.05%), orbital gyrus (R¯p2=2.96%), and precentral gyrus (R¯p2=2.80%). Our ridge regression, although outperformed by the most sophisticated ML approaches, identifies the importance and relative contribution of each brain structure to overall BA. Aside from its interpretability and quasi-mechanistic insights, our model can be used to validate future ML approaches for BA estimation.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1