Multinational evaluation of the measurement invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–brief form 2.0: Comparison of student and community samples across seven countries.

Adam P. Natoli, Bo Bach, Alex Behn, Marianne Cottin, Emanuela S. Gritti, Joost Hutsebaut, Nishtha Lamba, Yann Le Corff, Johannes Zimmermann, Mélanie Lapalme

Psychological Assessment · 2022 · 41 citations · 46 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

= 941) populations. After confirming adequate model fit separately in the community and student samples, we evaluated a series of increasingly stringent model comparisons to test three aspects of measurement invariance (configural, metric, scalar) and then examined latent mean differences across countries. Full scalar invariance was supported in the community sample and partial scalar invariance was supported in the student sample. Evaluation of latent mean differences revealed multiple significant differences. Overall, the LPFS-BF 2.0 appears to assess self- and interpersonal functioning impairment similarly across the included countries. Findings are discussed through the lenses of the cultures from which participants were recruited, as well as in the context of alternative explanations. Limitations, plans for future research, and implications for both research and clinical practice are offered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

References

46