International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2022 · 16 citations · 27 references
Veterinary MedicineBiotechnologyMolecular GeneticsAssisted Reproductive TechnologiesEmbryo TransferGenome EditingEmbryo BiotechnologyEmbryo ManipulationReproductive Biotechnology In LivestockSheep ReproductionCrispr-cas Genome EditingCrispr-cas9 Genome EditingCrispr-cas9 KnockoutEarly Embryo DevelopmentElectroporationEmbryo ElectroporationGenome Editing In EmbryosMutation Rate Determination
We investigated the possibility of single-step genome editing in small ruminants by CRISPR-Cas9 zygote electroporation. We targeted SOCS2 and PDX1 in sheep embryos and OTX2 in goat embryos, utilizing a dual sgRNA approach. Gene editing efficiency was compared between microinjection and three different electroporation settings performed at four different times of embryo development. Electroporation of sheep zygotes 6 h after fertilization with settings that included short high-voltage (poring) and long low-voltage (transfer) pulses was efficient at producing SOCS2 knock-out blastocysts. The mutation rate after CRISPR/Cas9 electroporation was 95.6% ± 8%, including 95.4% ± 9% biallelic mutations; which compared favorably to 82.3% ± 8% and 25% ± 10%, respectively, when using microinjection. We also successfully disrupted the PDX1 gene in sheep and the OTX2 gene in goat embryos. The biallelic mutation rate was 81 ± 5% for PDX1 and 85% ± 6% for OTX2. In conclusion, using single-step CRISPR-Cas9 zygote electroporation, we successfully introduced biallelic deletions in the genome of small ruminant embryos.
27
Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition
Eva K. Brinkman, Tao Chen, Mario Amendola et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 2014 · 2.6K citations · Full text