The Astrophysical Journal · 2022 · 22 citations · 127 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsOptical AstronomyX-ray AstronomyExtragalactic X-ray SourcesX-ray BinariesHard X-ray BackgroundObscuration EffectsOptical Emission SpectraSoft X-ray AstronomySoft X-ray BackgroundStellar CoronaeX-ray Background SpectrumX-ray Coronae
Abstract We utilize recent NuSTAR observations (co-added depth ≈55–120 ks) of PG 1001+054, PG 1254+047, and PHL 1811 to constrain their hard X-ray (≳5 keV) weakness and spectral shapes and thus to investigate the nature of their extreme X-ray weakness. These quasars showed very weak soft X-ray emission, and they were proposed to be intrinsically X-ray weak, with the X-ray coronae producing weak continuum emission relative to their optical/UV emission. However, the new observations suggest an alternative explanation. The NuSTAR 3–24 keV spectral shapes for PG 1001+054 and PHL 1811 are likely flat (effective power-law photon indices <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>eff</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>eff</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , respectively), while the shape is nominal for PG 1254+047 (Γ eff = 1.8 ± 0.3). PG 1001+054 and PHL 1811 are significantly weak at hard X-ray energies (by factors of ≈26–74 at rest-frame 8 keV) compared to the expectations from their optical/UV emission, while PG 1254+047 is only hard X-ray weak by a factor of ≈3. We suggest that X-ray obscuration is present in all three quasars. We propose that, as an alternative to the intrinsic X-ray weakness + X-ray obscuration scenario, the soft and hard X-ray weakness of these quasars can be uniformly explained under an obscuration-only scenario. This model provides adequate descriptions of the multiepoch soft and hard X-ray data of these quasars, with variable column density and leaked fraction of the partial covering absorber. We suggest that the absorber is the clumpy dust-free wind launched from the accretion disk. These quasars probably have super-Eddington accretion rates that drive powerful and high-density winds.
127
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2020 · 14.1K citations · Full text
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
Michael F. Skrutskie, R. M. Cutri, R. Stiening et al. · The Astronomical Journal · 2006 · 12.2K citations · Full text
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
Donald G. York, Jennifer Adelman, John E. Anderson et al. · The Astronomical Journal · 2000 · 10.5K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +14