IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · 2022 · 23 citations · 14 references
Social SciencesCybersecurityDecision TheoryGame TheoryIncentive SystemsDenial-of-service AttacksIncentive CompatibilityBlockchain ConsensusBlockchain-based SecurityDenial Of ServiceDenial Of Service Attack MitigationDenial-of-service MitigationDenial-of-service ResistanceProof Of Work IncentivesProof-of-work Defense
In this paper, we focus on mining attacks targeting the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism in blockchain-based systems. Specifically, we model mining as a game and propose a mining attack – the Selfish mining-based denial of service (SDoS) attack. By studying the choices (mining or stopping) of honest miners under the attack and the adversary’s revenue, we demonstrate that selfish mining is incentive-compatible with game-level denial of service attack, and that SDoS can be more threatening than existing mining attacks. Even under the worst assumption, the adversary only needs to master more than 19.6% of the total mining power to increase the revenue, and can launch a 51% attack with much less than 50%. In addition, we show that honest miners may make decisions based on the overall or current utility, and choosing the current utility is more beneficial to the adversary.
14
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Dr Craig S Wright · SSRN Electronic Journal · 2008 · 14.3K citations · Full text
A Survey on Consensus Mechanisms and Mining Strategy Management in Blockchain Networks
Wenbo Wang, Dinh Thai Hoang, Peizhao Hu et al. · IEEE Access · 2019 · 990 citations · Full text
When Mobile Blockchain Meets Edge Computing
Zehui Xiong, Yang Zhang, Dusit Niyato et al. · IEEE Communications Magazine · 2018 · 554 citations
Stubborn Mining: Generalizing Selfish Mining and Combining with an Eclipse Attack
Kartik Nayak, Srijan Kumar, Andrew Miller et al. · 2016 · 482 citations