International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2022 · 62 citations · 41 references
Social SciencesHealth SciencesPsychologyHealth AssessmentHealth PsychologyPsychometricsHealth-related Quality Of LifeHealth-related Quality Of Life MeasurementMental Well-beingPsychological Well-beingQuality Of LifeQuality Of Life AssessmentConstruct ValidityConstruct Validity AssessmentEmotional Well-being AssessmentGeneralized Anxiety Disorder AssessmentLife Satisfaction MeasurementPsychometric PropertiesPsychometric ScalingPsychometric Validity
Nurses' well-being has been increasingly recognised due to the ongoing pandemic. However, no validation scales measuring nurses' well-being currently exist. Thus, we aimed to validate the WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in a sample of nurses. A cross-sectional multinational study was conducted, and a total of 678 nurses who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain (36.9%), Chile (40.0%) and Norway (23.1%) participated in this study. The nurses completed the WHO-5, the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2) and three questions about the quality of life (QoL). The WHO-5 demonstrated good reliability and validity in the three countries. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.81 to 0.90. High correlations were found between the WHO-5 and the psychological well-being dimension of QoL, and negative correlations between the WHO-5 and PHQ-2. The unidimensional scale structure was confirmed in all the countries, explaining more than 68% of the variance. The item response theory likelihood ratio model did not show discernible differences in the WHO-5 across the countries. To conclude, the WHO-5 is a psychometrically sound scale for measuring nurses' well-being during a pandemic. The scale showed strong construct validity for cross-cultural comparisons; however, more research is required with larger sample sizes.
41
The Patient Health Questionnaire-2
Kurt Kroenke, Robert L. Spitzer, Janet B. W. Williams · Medical Care · 2003 · 6.3K citations
Nadia Garnefski, V. Kraaij, Maya J. Schroevers et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · 2008 · 2.5K citations · Full text