Value in Health · 2022 · 25 citations · 17 references
PharmacyOncologyPharmacoeconomicsBudget Impact AnalysisCost-effectiveness AnalysisHealth Technology AssessmentBudget Impact ConsiderationsCost-effectiveness ComparisonCost-effectiveness ModelingGenome SequencingHealthcare Cost AnalysisSequencing-based DiagnosticsBudget Impact PerspectiveCancer Cost BurdenCancer Genomics DiagnosticsCost-effectiveness Of Diagnostic TestingDiagnostic Cost AnalysisDiagnostic Test CostsIncremental Budget ImpactWhole-genome Sequencing Analysis
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness, budget impact (BI), and impact of uncertainty of future developments concerning whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as a clinical diagnostic test compared with standard of care (SoC) in patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: A total of 3 likely scenarios to take place within 5 years (according to experts) were simulated using a previously developed, peer reviewed, and published decision model. The scenarios concerned "WGS results used for treatment selection" (scenario 1), "WGS-based biomarker for immunotherapy" (scenario 2), and "off-label drug approval for WGS results" (scenario 3). Two diagnostic strategies of the original model, "SoC" and "WGS as a diagnostic test" (base model), were used to compare our scenarios with. Outcomes were reported for the base model, all scenarios separately, combined (combined unweighted), and weighted by likelihood (combined weighted). Cost-effectiveness, BI, and value of information analyses were performed for WGS compared with SoC. RESULTS: Total costs and quality-adjusted life-years for SoC in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were €149 698 and 1.235. Incremental outcomes of WGS were €1529/0.002(base model), -€222/0.020(scenario 1), -€2576/0.023(scenario 2), €388/0.024(scenario 3), -€5041/0.060(combined unweighted), and -€1715/0.029(combined weighted). The annual BI for adopting WGS for this population in The Netherlands ranged between €682 million (combined unweighted) and €714 million (base model). The consequences of uncertainty amounted to €3.4 million for all scenarios (combined weighted) and to €699 000 for the diagnostic yield of WGS alone (combined weighted). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that it is likely for WGS to become cost-effective within the near future if it identifies more patients with actionable targets and show the impact of uncertainty regarding its diagnostic yield. Modeling future scenarios can be useful to consider early adoption of WGS while timely anticipating on unforeseen developments before final conclusions are reached.
17
Pan-cancer whole-genome analyses of metastatic solid tumours
Peter Priestley, Jonathan Baber, Martijn P. Lolkema et al. · Nature · 2019 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis
Andrew Briggs, Milton C. Weinstein, Elisabeth Fenwick et al. · Medical Decision Making · 2012 · 886 citations · Full text