BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · 2022 · 16 citations · 27 references
MedicineGeneticsObstetricsHigh-risk PregnancyMedical GeneticsPrenatal DiagnosisGenetic Risk AssessmentInvasive Prenatal TestingPrenatal AssessmentPrenatal CarePrenatal Genetic DiagnosisPrenatal Risk AssessmentChromosomal Abnormality DetectionChromosomal Abnormality RiskChromosomal Abnormality ScreeningNon-invasive Prenatal TestingPrenatal Diagnosis Of Chromosomal DisordersPrenatal Diagnostic TestingPrenatal ScreeningScreening In High-risk Pregnancies
BACKGROUND: A fast adoption of a non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in clinical practice is a global tendency last years. Firstly, in Russia according a new regulation it was possible to perform a widescale testing of pregnant women in chromosomal abnormality risk. The aim of the study-to assess efficiency of using NIPT as a second-line first trimester screening test in Moscow. METHODS: Based on the first trimester combined prenatal screening results 12,700 pregnant women were classified as a high-risk (cut-off ≥ 1:100) and an intermediate-risk (cut-off 1:101 - 1:2500) groups followed by whole genome NIPT. Women from high-risk group and those who had positive NIPT results from intermediate-risk group were considered for invasive prenatal diagnostic. RESULTS: 258 (2.0%) samples with positive NIPT results were detected including 126 cases of trisomy 21 (T21), 40 cases of T18, 12 cases of T13, 41 cases of sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and 39 cases of rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) and significant copy number variations (CNVs). Statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) were revealed for fetal fraction (FF) and both for some patient's (body mass index and weight) and fetus's (sex and high risk of aneuploidies) characteristics. NIPT showed as a high sensitivity as specificity for common trisomies and SCAs with an overall false positive rate 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity. As a second-line screening test it has shown a high efficiency in detecting fetus chromosomal anomalies as well as it could potentially lower the number of invasive procedures in pregnant women.
27
Anthony R. Gregg, Brian G. Skotko, Judith Benkendorf et al. · Genetics in Medicine · 2016 · 692 citations · Full text
Gestational age and maternal weight effects on fetal cell‐free DNA in maternal plasma
Eric Wang, Annette Batey, Craig A. Struble et al. · Prenatal Diagnosis · 2013 · 434 citations · Full text
Karuna R. M. van der Meij, Erik A. Sistermans, Merryn Macville et al. · The American Journal of Human Genetics · 2019 · 374 citations · Full text