Frontiers in Oncology · 2022 · 11 citations · 58 references
Life SciencesGeneticsOncologyCancer GeneticsDna RepairMolecular OncologyCancer Genomic InstabilityCancer GenomicsDna DamageGenotoxic CarcinogenesisGermline Cancer PredispositionNext-generation Sequencing In OncologyDna Damage Response PathwaysDna Double-strand BreaksDouble-strand Dna BreaksHomologous Recombination RepairPathogenic Variant AssociationPesticide GenotoxicityPesticide-related Cancer RiskTumor Mutational Burden
Homologous recombination is a crucial pathway that is specialized in repairing double-strand breaks; thus, alterations in genes of this pathway may lead to loss of genomic stability and cell growth suppression. Pesticide exposure potentially increases cancer risk through several mechanisms, such as the genotoxicity caused by chronic exposure, leading to gene alteration. To analyze this hypothesis, we investigated if breast cancer patients exposed to pesticides present a different mutational pattern in genes related to homologous recombination ( BRCA1 , BRCA2 , PALB2 , and RAD51D ) and damage-response ( TP53 ) concerning unexposed patients. We performed multiplex PCR-based assays and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of all coding regions and flanking splicing sites of BRCA1 , BRCA2 , PALB2 , TP53 , and RAD51D in 158 unpaired tumor samples from breast cancer patients on MiSeq (Illumina) platform. We found that exposed patients had tumors with more pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants than unexposed patients (p = 0.017). In general, tumors that harbored a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant had a higher mutational burden (p < 0.001). We also observed that breast cancer patients exposed to pesticides had a higher mutational burden when diagnosed before 50 years old (p = 0.00978) and/or when carrying BRCA1 (p = 0.0138), BRCA2 (p = 0.0366), and/or PALB2 (p = 0.00058) variants, a result not found in the unexposed group. Our results show that pesticide exposure impacts the tumor mutational landscape and could be associated with the carcinogenesis process, therapy response, and disease progression. Further studies should increase the observation period in exposed patients to better evaluate the impact of these findings.
58
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri J. Bale et al. · Genetics in Medicine · 2015 · 32.2K citations · Full text
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
Samuel S. Shapiro, M. B. Wilk · Biometrika · 1965 · 19.3K citations
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Frank Wilcoxon · Biometrics Bulletin · 1945 · 14.4K citations
Business, Computer Science, Multi-criteria Decision Making +8
A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data
Mark A. DePristo, Eric Banks, Ryan Poplin et al. · Nature Genetics · 2011 · 12.4K citations · Full text