Critical Care · 2022 · 73 citations · 26 references
AgricultureNutritionClinical NutritionNutritional Support In Critical CareSepsisCritical Care NutritionEnteral NutritionIntensive Care MedicineNutritional SupportSepsis ManagementSeptic ShockCirculatory FailureCirculatory Shock ManagementEnteral Fluid SupplementationEnteral Nutrition In ShockNutrition In Critical IllnessNutritional Support TimingProtein Dose-responseSeptic Shock Management
INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence on the timing and efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) practices in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with circulatory shock is limited. We hypothesized early EN (EEN), as compared to delayed EN (DEN), is associated with improved clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with circulatory shock. METHODS: We analyzed a dataset from an international, multicenter, pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating protein dose in ICU patients. Data were collected from ICU admission, and EEN was defined as initiating < 48 h from ICU admission and DEN > 48 h. We identified MV patients in circulatory shock to evaluate the association between the timing of EN initiation and clinical outcomes. The regression analysis model controlled for age, mNUTRIC score, APACHE II score, sepsis, and Site. RESULTS: We included 626 patients, from 52 ICUs in 14 countries. Median age was 60 years [18-93], 55% had septic shock, 99% received norepinephrine alone, 91% received EN alone, and 50.3% were randomized to a usual protein dose. Forty-two percent of EEN patients had persistent organ dysfunction syndrome plus death at day 28, compared to 53% in the DEN group (p = 0.04). EEN was associated with more ICU-free days (9.3 ± 9.2 vs. 5.7 ± 7.9, p = 0.0002), more days alive and free of vasopressors (7.1 ± 3.1 vs. 6.3 ± 3.2, p = 0.007), and shorter duration of MV among survivors (9.8 ± 10.9 vs. 13.8 ± 14.5, p = 0.0002). This trend was no longer observed in the adjusted analysis. There were no differences in ICU/60-day mortality or feeding intolerance rates between groups. CONCLUSION: In MV patients with circulatory shock, EEN, as compared to DEN, was associated with improved clinical outcomes, but no longer when adjusting for illness severity. RCTs comparing the efficacy of EEN to DEN in MV patients with circulatory shock are warranted.
26
Paul A. Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert J. Thielke et al. · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · 2008 · 51.7K citations · Full text
ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit
Pierre Singer, Annika Reintam Blaser, Mette M. Berger et al. · Clinical Nutrition · 2018 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Cathy Alberda, Leah Gramlich, N. F. Jones et al. · Intensive Care Medicine · 2009 · 963 citations · Full text