Limnology and Oceanography Methods · 2022 · 20 citations · 56 references
ComputingBioengineeringComputer ScienceComputer VisionMachine LearningPhycologyCellular ImagingDeep LearningFeature DetectionFlow CytometryPattern RecognitionPhytoplankton EcologyAutomatic ClassificationAutomatic RecognitionCell ClassificationConvolutional Neural NetworksManual ClassificationPhytoplankton DistributionPhytoplankton Functional TraitsPhytoplankton Functional Types
Abstract The variability of phytoplankton distribution has been unraveled by high‐frequency measurements. Such a resolution can be approached by automated pulse‐shape recording flow cytometry (AFCM) operating at hourly sampling resolution. AFCM records morphological and physiological traits as single‐cell optical pulse shapes that can be used to classify cells into phytoplankton functional groups (PFGs). However, the associated manual post‐processing of the data coupled with the increasing size and number of datasets is time‐consuming and error‐prone. Machine learning models are increasingly used to run automatic classification. Yet, most of the existing methods either present a long training process, need to manually design features from the raw optical pulse shapes, or are dedicated to images only. In this study, we present a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify several PFGs using AFCM pulse shapes. The uncertainties of manual classification were first estimated by comparing experts' recognition of six PFGs. Consensual particles from the manual PFG classification were used to train and validate the CNN. The CNN obtained competitive performances compared to other models used in the literature and remained robust across several sampling areas, and instrumental hardware and settings. Finally, we assessed the ability of this classifier to predict phytoplankton counts at a Mediterranean coastal station and from a cruise in the South‐West Indian Ocean, providing a comparison with the manual classification over 3‐month periods and a 2h frequency. These promising results strengthen the near real‐time observation of PFGs, especially required with the increasing use of AFCM in monitoring research programs.
56
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 222.1K citations · Full text
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · 2014 · 84.8K citations · Full text
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher et al. · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2009 · 61.8K citations
Going deeper with convolutions
Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia et al. · 2015 · 46.8K citations