World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · 2022 · 14 citations · 23 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryChemotherapyGastrointestinal OncologySurgical OncologyGastric CancerGastrointestinal Cancer SurgeryGastrointestinal SurgeryLaparoscopic SurgeryNeoadjuvant ChemotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyGastrointestinal Oncologic SurgeryLaparoscopic Cancer SurgeryLaparoscopic GastrectomyOncologic Gastrointestinal Surgery
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with surgery is regarded as an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Laparoscopic surgery represents the mainstream of minimally invasive surgery. Currently, surgeons focus more on surgical safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy after NACT. Thus, we sought to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) and open total gastrectomy (OTG) after NACT. AIM: To compare the short and long-term outcomes between LTG and OTG for AGC after NACT. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinicopathological data of 136 patients who accepted gastrectomy after NACT from June 2012 to June 2019, including 61 patients who underwent LTG and 75 who underwent OTG. Clinicopathological characteristics between the LTG and OTG groups showed no significant difference. SPSS 26.0, R software, and GraphPad PRISM 8.0 were used to perform statistical analyses. RESULTS: < 0.05). CONCLUSION: After NACT, LTG shows comparable 30-d postoperative morbidity as well as 3-year OS and DFS rate to OTG. We recommend that experienced surgeons select LTG other than OTG for proper AGC patients after NACT.
23
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Salah‐Eddin Al‐Batran, Nils Homann, Claudia Pauligk et al. · The Lancet · 2019 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition)
Gastric Cancer · 2020 · 1.8K citations · Full text