AIChE Journal · 2000 · 110 citations · 24 references
EngineeringComputational EngineeringOptimizationProcess ControlUncertainty QuantificationControl SystemsControl TheoryLinear ProgrammingModel Predictive ControlOptimal ControlRobust ControlControl FunctionsHierarchyModel UncertaintyPredictive ControlPredictive Control SystemsRobust Model Predictive ControlRobust Optimal Control
Abstract In practice, model predictive control (MPC) algorithms are typically embedded within a multilevel hierarchy of control functions. The MPC algorithm itself is usually implemented in two pieces: a steady‐state target calculation followed by a dynamic optimization. A new formulation of the steady‐state target calculation is presented that explicitly accounts for model uncertainty. When model uncertainty is incorporated, the linear program associated with the steady‐state target calculation can be recast as a second‐order cone program. This article shows how primal‐dual interior‐point methods can take advantage of the resulting structure. Simulation examples illustrate the effect of uncertainty on the steady‐state target calculation and demonstrate the advantages of interior‐point methods.
24
Lieven Vandenberghe, Stephen Boyd · SIAM Review · 1996 · 4.1K citations
Applications of second-order cone programming
Miguel Sousa Lobo, Lieven Vandenberghe, Stephen Boyd et al. · Linear Algebra and its Applications · 1998 · 2.4K citations
On the Implementation of a Primal-Dual Interior Point Method
Sanjay Mehrotra · SIAM Journal on Optimization · 1992 · 1.6K citations
Kiriakos Vlahos, Peter Kall, Stein W. Wallace · Journal of the Operational Research Society · 1995 · 805 citations