Publication | Open Access
A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task
50
Citations
0
References
2019
Year
Unknown Venue
NeuropsychologyInhibitory ProcessAffective NeuroscienceMotor ControlBehavior MonitoringAttentionBehavior AnalysisImpulsivityPsychologySocial SciencesImpulsive BehaviorsVoluntary ControlCognitive NeuroscienceResponse InhibitionCognitive ScienceBehavioral SciencesPsychiatryBehavioral NeuroscienceStop-signal TaskConsensus GuideRehabilitationExperimental PsychologyAction MonitoringNeuroscienceMedicineResponse-inhibition EfficiencyPsychopathology
Response inhibition is essential for navigating everyday life. Its derailment is considered integral to numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders, and more generally, to a wide range of behavioral and health problems. Response-inhibition efficiency furthermore correlates with treatment outcome in these conditions. The stop-signal task is an essential tool to determine how quickly response inhibition is implemented. Despite its apparent simplicity, there are many features (ranging from task design to data analysis) that vary across studies in ways that can easily compromise the validity of the obtained results. Our present goal is to facilitate a more accurate use of the stop-signal task. To this end, we provide twelve easy-to-implement consensus recommendations and point out the problems that can arise when these are not followed. This article is furthermore accompanied by user-friendly open-source resources intended to inform statistical-power considerations, facilitate the correct implementation of the task, and assist in proper data analysis.