Concepedia

TLDR

Innovation in public agencies arises from the interplay of motivation, obstacles, and resource availability, yet bureaucratic agencies often lack initiative and fail to respond to unexpressed public needs. The study seeks to identify determinants of innovation in public agencies, focusing on how they adopt and emphasize non‑traditional programs. The findings, broadly applicable to organizations, highlight that local public health departments have repeatedly seized opportunities to address emerging public problems over the past 25 years. No additional information provided.

Abstract

The present study is an attempt to identify the determinants of innovation in public agencies, i.e., the degree to which they adopt and emphasize programs that depart from traditional concerns. Innovation is suggested to be the function of an interaction among the motivation to innovate, the strength of obstacles against innovation, and the availability of resources for overcoming such obstacles. The significance of the research can be viewed in terms of Hyneman's observation nearly twenty years ago that bureaucratic agencies “… may fail to take the initiative and supply the leadership that is required of them in view of their relation to particular sectors of public affairs. …” His concern was the responsiveness of the public sector not only to expressed wants but to public wants that may go unexpressed, or be only weakly expressed, and whose utility is much more easily recognized by the informed bureaucratic official than by the ordinary citizen. While the results and conclusions to be reported appear to be largely valid for organizations in general, the empirical focus will be local departments of public health which, as a class, have had a rather dramatic succession of opportunities to respond to new public problems over the past twenty-five years. A brief introductory paragraph will orient the reader to the applied setting.

References

YearCitations

Page 1