2020 · 938 citations · 86 references
NursingHealth PolicyEvidence-based PracticeGood Clinical PracticeMeta-analysisDissemination Of Research FindingsLiterature Review MethodsStudy DesignSystematic ReviewSystematic Review MethodologySystematic Review MethodsGuidanceReview MethodologyReview Reporting StandardsSystematic Literature ReviewSystematic Review AppraisalSystematic Review Updating
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present exemplars from published reviews. We hope that changes to the content and structure of PRISMA 2020 will facilitate uptake of the guideline and lead to more transparent, complete and accurate reporting of systematic reviews.
86
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Andrea C. Tricco, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2018 · 40.4K citations · Full text
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg et al. · Scientific Data · 2016 · 17.8K citations · Full text