Assessment of Three-Phase Relative Permeability Models Using Laboratory Hysteresis Data

Abstract

Assessment of Three-Phase Relative Permeability Models Using Laboratory Hysteresis Data D.J. Element; D.J. Element ECL Technology Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar J.H.K. Masters; J.H.K. Masters ECL Technology Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar N.C. Sargent; N.C. Sargent ECL Technology Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar A.J. Jayasekera; A.J. Jayasekera U.K. Dept. of Trade & Industry Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar S.G. Goodyear S.G. Goodyear Shell International Exploration and Production B.V. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 2003. Paper Number: SPE-84903-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/84903-MS Published: October 20 2003 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Element, D.J., Masters, J.H.K., Sargent, N.C., Jayasekera, A.J., and S.G. Goodyear. "Assessment of Three-Phase Relative Permeability Models Using Laboratory Hysteresis Data." Paper presented at the SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 2003. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/84903-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific Search Advanced Search AbstractGas injection techniques, such as WAG, frequently require consideration of co-existing oil, gas and water phases and the impact of saturation cycles as water and gas slugs move through the reservoir. These processes may be assessed using numerical simulations. This paper presents the analysis of a detailed laboratory study, designed to provide data for verifying hysteresis models for such simulations.A number of studies have reported evidence for hysteresis in gas relative permeabilities in WAG flooding, leading to lower gas mobilities than predicted by conventional two-phase models. A reduction in gas mobility tends to improve gas sweep and incremental recovery for WAG based IOR schemes.Three-phase hysteresis models have recently been developed to include these hysteresis effects. The models include trapping of gas and reduction of water relative permeability in the presence of trapped gas. In these models, saturation changes can be irreversible, and relative permeability may decrease with each change in direction in saturation.A carefully planned laboratory study investigated secondary and tertiary immiscible WAG floods in both water-wet and intermediate-wet Berea cores, giving four separate sets of experimental data (a total of over 30 individual floods). For each flood, in-situ saturation profiles, mass balance and pressure drop data were measured. The in-situ saturation data ensures that laboratory artefacts (such as capillary end effects) do not influence conclusions.Analysis of the experimental data shows that hysteresis models should include the following features:Irreversibility of hysteresis cycles;Potential for the reduction in the residual oil saturation with trapping of gas by water;Reduction in both water and gas permeability, with potential for the fractional flow to vary with trapped gas saturation;Variation in Land trapping factor between hysteresis cycles.This study confirms the need for three-phase hysteresis models. Although published models may include some of the observed hysteresis effects, no model includes them all.IntroductionReservoir engineering calculations frequently require consideration of co-existing oil, gas and water phases. In the case of immiscible hydrocarbon gas WAG flooding, these considerations include the displacement of oil by simultaneous gas-water flow. These displacement processes are usually assessed using numerical simulation.Although the permeability of reservoir rock typically depends on the interstitial pore geometry, the relative permeability depends on factors such as wettability, spreading characteristics and the fluid distribution in the pore space. There is usually more than one way a given fraction of the pore space can be occupied by each fluid phase and so it is possible for different relative permeability values to be measured for the same fluid saturation. The sequence of saturation changes will, therefore, affect fluid distribution and the relative permeability. Historically, hysteresis effects have been included in numerical simulations using empirical models based on two-phase flow [1,2]. Recent investigations have considered hysteresis for more complex three-phase processes and a number of new models have been proposed for inclusion in commercial simulation packages [3,4,5]. Keywords: experiment, saturation, hysteresis model, gas flood, gas saturation, three-phase hysteresis model, enhanced recovery, permeability, water-wet core, flow in porous media Subjects: Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Flow in porous media, Gas-injection methods This content is only available via PDF. 2003. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.