BMC Medicine · 2022 · 22 citations · 23 references
MedicineMolecular BiologyOncologyCancer GeneticsGenomicsMolecular OncologyCancer GenomicsCancer Molecular DiagnosticsGene Fusions In CancerLung CancerNext-generation Sequencing In OncologyOncogenic Fusion GenesAlk Fusion GenesAlk Rearrangement TestingFusion Gene DetectionKinase Fusion GenesNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TherapyNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TreatmentOncogenic Fusion ProteinsTumor-specific Fusion Genes
BACKGROUND: Diverse genomic breakpoints of fusions that localize to intronic, exonic, or intergenic regions have been identified by DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS), but the role of exonic breakpoints remains elusive. We investigated whether exonic-breakpoint fusions could predict matched targeted therapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: NSCLC samples were analyzed by DNA NGS, RNA NGS, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Using DNA NGS, kinase fusions were identified in 685 of 7148 (9.6%) NSCLCs, with 74 harboring exonic-breakpoint fusions, mostly anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions. RNA NGS and IHC revealed that 11 of 55 (20%) exonic-breakpoint fusions generated no aberrant transcript/protein, possibly due to open reading frame disruption or different gene transcriptional orientations. Four cases of genomic-positive but RNA/protein-negative fusions were treated with matched targeted therapy, but progressive disease developed within 2 months. Nevertheless, 44 of 55 (80%) exonic-breakpoint fusions produced chimeric transcripts/proteins, possibly owing to various alternative splicing patterns, including exon skipping, alternative splice site selection, and intron retention. Most of these genomic- and RNA/protein-positive fusion cases showed a clinical response to matched targeted therapy. Particularly, there were no differences in objective response rate (P = 0.714) or median progression-free survival (P = 0.500) between intronic-breakpoint (n = 56) and exonic-breakpoint ALK fusion subtypes (n = 11) among ALK RNA/protein-validated patients who received first-line crizotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Exonic-breakpoint fusions may generate in-frame fusion transcripts/proteins or not, and thus are unreliable for predicting the efficacy of targeted therapy, which highlights the necessity of implementing RNA or protein assays for functional validation in exonic-breakpoint fusion cases.
23
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced <i>ALK</i> -Positive Lung Cancer
Alice T. Shaw, Dong‐Wan Kim, Kazuhiko Nakagawa et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 3.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +15
Crizotinib in <i>ROS1</i>-Rearranged Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Alice T. Shaw, Sai‐Hong Ignatius Ou, Yung‐Jue Bang et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2014 · 2K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Across Tumors from 8,705 Patients
André Kahles, Kjong-Van Lehmann, Nora C. Toussaint et al. · Cancer Cell · 2018 · 962 citations · Full text