American Journal of Hematology · 2022 · 14 citations · 19 references
MedicineOncologyPathologyCancer ImmunologyClinical ImmunologyTumor ProgressionBone Marrow EvaluationImmuno-oncology BiomarkersMultiple MyelomaTherapy Response AssessmentComplete Response AssessmentMonoclonal ProteinPrognostic CriteriaPrognostic Marker AssessmentPrognostic Marker EvaluationPrognostic PredictionPrognostic Staging SystemsPrognostic Variables
Achievement of a complete response (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) correlates with improvement in survival outcomes; however, its impact on prognostic variables at baseline outside of clinical trial settings is not well described. We sought to determine the impact of achieving a CR within 2 years from diagnosis, its effect on the prognostic value of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and International Staging System (ISS) risk, and examined additional predictors of outcome among those achieving a CR in a routine clinical setting. We evaluated 1869 newly diagnosed MM patients who had ≥ 2 monoclonal protein immunofixation studies in the serum and urine available within 24 months from diagnosis, categorizing those with ≥ 2 negative serum and urine immunofixations as achieving CR. With a landmark at 24 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) for CR versus non-CR patients was 29.8 versus 20.9 months (p ≤ .0002); median overall survival (OS) was 104 versus 70 months (p < .0001). The impact of achieving a CR was retained after adjusting for FISH, ISS, sex, transplant status, and involved heavy chain. Baseline FISH and ISS stage were not associated with PFS or OS among patients achieving a CR. The following variables were found as predictors of inferior OS within the CR cohort: age > 75 years, male gender, hypoalbuminemia, and non-immunoglobulin G involved heavy chain. Our study confirms that achievement of CR within 2 years from diagnosis is associated with improvement in survival outcomes and neutralization of the impact of FISH and ISS risk, thereby confirming observations from the clinical trial setting among a clinical practice cohort.
19
International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma
Philip R. Greipp, Jesús F. San Miguel, Brian G.M. Durie et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2005 · 2.9K citations
Medicine, Hematology, Oncology +14
Widespread Genetic Heterogeneity in Multiple Myeloma: Implications for Targeted Therapy
Jens G. Lohr, Petar Stojanov, Scott L. Carter et al. · Cancer Cell · 2014 · 1K citations · Full text
Daratumumab plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Untreated Myeloma
Thierry Façon, Shaji Kumar, Torben Plesner et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2019 · 987 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +13
Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma
Niccolò Bolli, Hervé Avet‐Loiseau, David C. Wedge et al. · Nature Communications · 2014 · 906 citations · Full text
Shaji Kumar, Joseph Mıkhael, Francis K. Buadi et al. · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · 2009 · 625 citations · Full text
Medicine, Hematology, Oncology +14