BMJ Open · 2021 · 30 citations · 32 references
MedicineRehabilitation MedicinePain ManagementPain MedicineRehabilitationActivity PacingFatigueHealth CoachingPhysical RehabilitationPhysical Therapy For PainFatigue Management In RehabilitationNorthern EnglandPacing In Chronic PainPacing In FibromyalgiaPhysical Function AssessmentPhysical Function MeasurementRecruitment RatesRehabilitation Follow-up
OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of using a new activity pacing framework to standardise healthcare professionals' instructions of pacing, and explore whether measures of activity pacing/symptoms detected changes following treatment. DESIGN: Single-arm, repeated measures study. SETTING: One National Health Service (NHS) Pain Service in Northern England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with chronic pain/fatigue, including chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. INTERVENTIONS: Six-week rehabilitation programme, standardised using the activity pacing framework. OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was explored via patients' recruitment/attrition rates, adherence and satisfaction, and healthcare professionals' fidelity. Questionnaire data were collected from patients at the start and end of the programme (T1 and T2, respectively) and 3 months' follow-up (T3). Questionnaires included measures of activity pacing, current/usual pain, physical/mental fatigue, depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, avoidance, physical/mental function and quality of life. Mean changes in activity pacing and symptoms between T1-T2, T2-T3 and T1-T3 were estimated. RESULTS: Of the 139 eligible patients, 107 patients consented (recruitment rate=77%); 65 patients completed T2 (T1-T2 attrition rate=39%), and 52 patients completed T3 (T1-T3 attrition rate=51%). At T2, patients' satisfaction ratings averaged 9/10, and 89% attended ≥5 rehabilitation programme sessions. Activity pacing and all symptoms improved between T1 and T2, with smaller improvements maintained at T3. CONCLUSION: The activity pacing framework was feasible to implement and patients' ability to pace and manage their symptoms improved. Future work will employ a suitable comparison group and test the framework across wider settings to explore the effects of activity pacing in a randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03497585.
32
Kurt Kroenke, Robert L. Spitzer, Janet B. W. Williams · Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2001 · 44.2K citations · Full text
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Robert L. Spitzer, Kurt Kroenke, Janet B. W. Williams et al. · Archives of Internal Medicine · 2006 · 31.5K citations
Nursing, Psychiatry, Psychology +17
A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey
John E. Ware, Mark Kosinski, Susan Keller · Medical Care · 1996 · 17.1K citations
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe, Sally MacIntyre et al. · BMJ · 2008 · 11.4K citations · Full text
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Michael Herdman, Claire Gudex, Andrew Lloyd et al. · Quality of Life Research · 2011 · 10K citations · Full text