Development Policy Review · 2021 · 36 citations · 22 references
ManagementEmergency PlanningRisk ManagementCrisis ManagementDisaster ResponseRisk AssessmentCrisis PreparednessCrisis ResponseDisaster Risk AssessmentHumanitarian Assistance PolicyHumanitarian ReliefResponse PolicyDisaster AidDisaster Relief PolicyDisaster Response SystemsHumanitarian Crisis ResponseHumanitarian Decision-makingHumanitarian Relief OperationsSocial Assistance Policy
Motivation: Social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response increasingly overlap, especially where recurrent crises and persistent conflicts prevail. In such situations, distinctions between risk and uncertainty become especially important. It is critical for policy and practice to shift from focusing on risk assessment and management to embracing uncertainty. Purpose: The article assesses the appropriateness of two approaches to social assistance and humanitarian relief where crises recur and conflicts persist: risk assessment and management; and embracing uncertainty and ignorance. Methods and approach: The article reviews different approaches to social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, and asks how they are framed. It draws on experiences from programmes offering social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, highlighting the professional, bureaucratic, and institutional features that influence programme design and functioning. These are compared with "high-reliability" approaches deployed in other critical infrastructure-such as water and energy supply. Findings: Mainstream approaches focus on risk assessment and management, assuming predictability and stability. This is problematic, especially in settings of crisis and conflict where there may be no functioning delivery system for social assistance and relief. The article highlights alternatives to the mainstream risk-focused approaches, which emphasize learning, collaboration, adaptation, and flexibility. Such approaches must build on embedded practices of moral economy, collective action, and mutual care and be supported through professional and institutional capacities that generate reliability. Policy implications: The article suggests a new agenda for the intersection of social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, which makes uncertainty the focus for rethinking responses at scale, especially in settings affected by crisis and conflict.
22
Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World
Jianguo Liu, Vanessa Hull, Mateus Batistella et al. · Ecology and Society · 2013 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Social Sciences, Environmental Social Science, Sustainability Management +12
The risk management of everything
Michael Power · The Journal of Risk Finance · 2004 · 789 citations