EPiC series in computing · 2021 · 23 citations · 20 references
ComputingComputer ScienceSystems EngineeringAutomationCyber-physical SystemsRequirements EngineeringCyber-physical Systems DesignInput ValidationModel CheckingSpecification LanguagesTemporal LogicVerificationCyber-physical Systems SafetyReal-time Systems VerificationTemporal Logic AssertionsTemporal Logic SpecificationTemporal Logic VerificationTemporal SpecificationsTemporal Verification
This report presents the results from the 2021 friendly competition in the ARCH work- shop for the falsification of temporal logic specifications over Cyber-Physical Systems. We briefly describe the competition settings, which have been inherited from the previ- ous years, give background on the participating teams and tools and discuss the selected benchmarks. Apart from new requirements and participants, the major novelty in this instalment is that falsifying inputs have been validated independently. During this pro- cess, we uncovered several issues like configuration errors and computational discrepancies, stressing the importance of this kind of validation.
20
Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Volodymyr Mnih, Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Mehdi Mirza et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2016 · 1.7K citations · Full text
The synchronous data flow programming language LUSTRE
Nicolas Halbwachs, P. Caspi, Pascal Raymond et al. · Proceedings of the IEEE · 1991 · 1.5K citations · Full text
Specifying real-time properties with metric temporal logic
Ron Koymans · Real-Time Systems · 1990 · 1.2K citations
A Restart CMA Evolution Strategy With Increasing Population Size
Anne Auger, Nikolaus Hansen · 2005 · 937 citations
Powertrain control verification benchmark
Xiaoqing Jin, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, James Kapinski et al. · 2014 · 174 citations
Engineering, Automotive Engineering, Systems Engineering +16