Adverse Drug Events: Identification and Attribution

Abraham G. Hartzema, Miquel Porta, Hugh H. Tilson, Audrey Smith Rogers

Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy · 1987 · 88 citations · 16 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Adverse drug event definitions vary by purpose, with precise definitions needed for scientific linkage but broader ones often sufficient clinically, while safety data at marketing are limited and attribution relies on data quality, with regulatory recalls typically based on epidemiologic evidence. The article aims to guide definition selection, assess pre‑marketing safety data, recommend post‑marketing data collection methods, and outline criteria for attributing causality to adverse drug events. Post‑marketing safety data are supplemented through the FDA’s Spontaneous Reporting System, large‑scale formal studies, and targeted research projects.

Abstract

The definition of an adverse drug event should be tailored to one's purpose in examining the incident. Although the more specific of these definitions is required for scientific evaluation of the link between drug and event, other less stringent definitions are usually adequate for clinical purposes. Knowledge about the safety profile of a drug in humans is limited at the time of marketing. The mechanisms for supplementing safety data during postmarketing include (1) the Spontaneous Reporting System maintained by the Food and Drug Administration, (2) formal projects to assemble safety data on larger or more complex populations, and (3) formal projects designed to answer specific research questions. Judgments about attribution can be no better than the data that support them. The criteria applied by the clinician to the individual adverse drug experience to determine association differ from those required to establish causation based on epidemiologic evidence. In most situations, regulatory action on drug recall should be based on epidemiologic evidence. This article will discuss the choice of a definition for an adverse drug event, examine the extent and nature of the safety data assembled on a drug at the time it is marketed, propose the best methods for collecting additional information after marketing, and designate factors to be considered in judging a drug to be causally related to an adverse event.

References

16