Research in Science Education · 2021 · 24 citations · 25 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsScience EducationDiscourse AnalysisScience CommunicationSociolinguisticsMultimodal AnalysisMultimodal CommunicationMultimodal DiscourseSemiotic AnalysisSemioticsSocial SemioticsMultimodal Communication AnalysisMultimodal Science CommunicationSemiotic InterpretationSystemic Functional Grammar
Teaching and learning in science rely on multimodal communication, yet students struggle to interpret diverse semiotic resources, highlighting the need for a comprehensive analytical framework. This study develops a social semiotic framework to reveal how multimodal texts convey content through various semiotic resources and how students or authors position themselves relative to the subject. The authors employ social semiotic tools—SFL and multimodality theory—to analyze a student text and a teaching resource that combine drawn, written, and symbolic elements. Analyses demonstrate that the framework uncovers students’ content knowledge for formative assessment and assists teachers in selecting resources and fostering classroom discussion.
Abstract Teaching and learning in science disciplines are dependent on multimodal communication. Earlier research implies that students may be challenged when trying to interpret and use different semiotic resources. There have been calls for extensive frameworks that enable analysis of multimodal texts in science education. In this study, we combine analytical tools deriving from social semiotics, including systemic functional linguistics (SFL), where the ideational, interpersonal, and textual metafunctions are central. In regard to other modes than writing — and to analyse how textual resources are combined — we build on aspects highlighted in research on multimodality. The aim of this study is to uncover how such a framework can provide researchers and teachers with insights into the ways in which various aspects of the content in multimodal texts are communicated through different semiotic resources. Furthermore, we aim to explore how different text resources interact and, finally, how the students, or authors of teaching resources, position themselves in relation to the subject. Data consist of one student text and one teaching resource text, both comprising drawn and written elements in combination with symbols. Our analyses of the student text suggest that the proposed framework can provide insights into students’ content knowledge and, hence, how construction of multimodal texts may be a useful tool for formative assessment. When it comes to teaching resources, the framework may be a useful tool for teachers when choosing resources, particularly in relation to students’ possibilities of meaning making when engaging with such texts, but also, as a basis for classroom discussions.
25
Reading images: the grammar of visual design
Choice Reviews Online · 1996 · 8.8K citations
Social Sciences, Design, Narratology +16
Jeff Bezemer, Günther Kress · Written Communication · 2008 · 749 citations
A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media
Radan Martinec · Visual Communication · 2005 · 562 citations