AIAA Journal · 2021 · 12 citations · 54 references
EngineeringAerospace EngineeringMechanical EngineeringComputational Fluid DynamicsFluid DynamicsFluid MechanicsAeroelastic ModelingComputational AerodynamicsComputational AeroelasticityUnsteady AerodynamicsWing AerodynamicsWing TheoryComputational Unsteady AerodynamicsFinite Wing TheoryLinear Aeroelastic TheoryLow Reynolds Number AerodynamicsReynolds NumberThree-dimensional Wing EffectsVortex SheddingVortical Flow
Unsteady lifting-line theory (ULLT) is a low-order method capable of modeling interacting unsteady and finite wing effects at low computational cost. Most formulations of the method assume inviscid flow and small amplitudes. Although these assumptions might be suitable for small-amplitude aeroelastic problems at high Reynolds numbers, modern engineering applications increasingly involve lower Reynolds numbers, large-amplitude kinematics, and vortex structures that lead to aerodynamic nonlinearities. This paper establishes that ULLT still provides a useful solution for low-Reynolds-number, large-amplitude kinematics problems, by comparing ULLT results against those of experimentally validated computational fluid dynamics simulations at . Three-dimensional effects stabilize leading-edge vortex (LEV) structures, resulting in a good prediction of whole wing force coefficients by ULLT. Although the inviscid spanwise force distributions are accurate for small-amplitude kinematics, the ULLT cannot model three-dimensional vortical structures, and thus it cannot correctly predict the force distribution due to the LEV. It can, however, predict the shedding of LEVs to a limited extent via the leading-edge suction parameter criterion. This can then be used as an indicator of the usefulness of the force distribution results.
54
Progress in analysis and prediction of dynamic stall
L. W. Carr · Journal of Aircraft · 1988 · 721 citations
Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering +17