Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2021 · 30 citations · 28 references
MedicineNeurologyRehabilitation MedicineNeurorehabilitationRehabilitationStroke RehabilitationGait RehabilitationLower Extremity RehabilitationLower Limb RehabilitationRehabilitation RoboticsRobotic ExoskeletonsRobotic RehabilitationExoskeleton RehabilitationLocomotor Function AssessmentLocomotor InterventionLocomotor RehabilitationLower Limb Rehabilitation RoboticsLower-limb Robotic TherapyRehabilitation RobotsSubacute Stroke Rehabilitation
Objective : To investigate the efficacy and safety of a novel lower-limb exoskeletal robot, BEAR-H1 (Shenzhen Milebot Robot Technology), in the locomotor function of subacute stroke patients. Methods : The present study was approved by the ethical committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (No. 2019-MD-43), and registration was recorded on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with a unique identifier: ChiCTR2100044475. A total of 130 patients within 6 months of stroke were randomly divided into two groups: the robot group and the control group. The control group received routine training for walking, while in the robot group, BEAR-H1 lower-limb exoskeletal robot was used for locomotor training. Both groups received two sessions daily, 5 days a week for 4 weeks consecutively. Each session lasted 30 min. Before treatment, after treatment for 2 weeks, and 4 weeks, the patients were assessed based on the 6-minute walking test (6MWT), functional ambulation scale (FAC), Fugl-Meyer assessment lower-limb subscale (FMA-LE), and Vicon gait analysis. Results : After a 4-week intervention, the results of 6MWT, FMA-LE, FAC, cadence, and gait cycle in the two groups significantly improved ( P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P > 0.05). The ratio of stance phase to that of swing phase, swing phase symmetry ratio (SPSR), and step length symmetry ratio (SLSR) was not significantly improved after 4 weeks of training in both the groups. Further analyses revealed that the robot group exhibited potential benefits, as the point estimates of 6MWT and Δ6MWT (post-pre) at 4 weeks were higher than those in the control group. Additionally, within-group comparison showed that patients in the robot group had a significant improvement in 6MWT earlier than their counterparts in the control group. Conclusions : The rehabilitation robot in this study could improve the locomotor function of stroke patients; however, its effect was no better than conventional locomotor training.
28
Theo Vos, Stephen S Lim, Cristiana Abbafati et al. · The Lancet · 2020 · 19.2K citations · Full text
Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Stroke in China
Wenzhi Wang, Bin Jiang, Haixin Sun et al. · Circulation · 2017 · 2K citations · Full text
Randomized Clinical Trial of Therapeutic Exercise in Subacute Stroke
Pamela W. Duncan, Stephanie A. Studenski, Lorie Richards et al. · Stroke · 2003 · 576 citations