PLoS ONE · 2021 · 29 citations · 20 references
MedicineEmergency MedicineInternal MedicineHemodynamic ManagementResuscitationSepsisCardiopulmonary ResuscitationFluid ManagementFluid ResuscitationMechanical VentilationSepsis ManagementSeptic ShockClinical Fluid ResuscitationCongestive Heart Failure ManagementFluid Bolus TherapyIn-hospital MortalityPrimary Outcome AnalysisResuscitation Fluid TherapySepsis Fluid ManagementSepsis Fluid Resuscitation
BACKGROUND: The use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock remained controversial due to the paucity of data. METHODS: The retrospective case-control study included 671 adult patients who presented to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital from January 01, 2017 to December 31, 2019 with severe sepsis or septic shock. Patients were categorized into the CHF group and the non-CHF group. The primary outcome was to evaluate the compliance with ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus within 6 hours of presentation. The comparison of baseline characteristics and secondary outcomes were done between the groups who received ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus. For the subgroup analysis of the CHF group, it was divided based on if they received ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus or not, and comparison was done for baseline characteristics and secondary outcomes. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to explore the differences between the groups for in-hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: The use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus was low in both the CHF and non-CHF groups [39% vs. 66% (p<0.05)]. Mortality was higher in the CHF group [33% vs 18% (p<0.05)]. Multivariable analysis revealed that the use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus decreased the chances of mortality by 12% [OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.95 (p<0.05)]. The use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus did not increase the odds of mechanical ventilation [OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.05 (p = 0.78)]. In subgroup analysis, the use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus decreased the chances of mortality by 5% [OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-0.99, (p<0.05)] and did not increase the odds of mechanical ventilation. The presence of the low ejection fraction did not influence the chance of getting fluid bolus. CONCLUSION: The use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus seems to confer protection against in-hospital mortality and is not associated with increased chances of mechanical ventilation in heart failure patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock.
20
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
Clyde W. Yancy, Mariell Jessup, Biykem Bozkurt et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2013 · 12.6K citations
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary
Clyde W. Yancy, Mariell Jessup, Biykem Bozkurt et al. · Circulation · 2013 · 3.3K citations