2021 · 90 citations · 30 references
EngineeringTransactional SystemDistributed LedgerTransaction ProcessingCryptocurrencyMarket DesignProfitable Defi TradesFintechMev OpportunityDefi TransactionsMechanism DesignQuantitative ManagementInteraction ProtocolEconomicsComputer ScienceFinanceTransactional ApplicationFormal MethodsBusinessDefi ProtocolsFinancial EngineeringBlockchainDistributed TransactionBlockchain Protocol
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is a blockchain-asset-enabled finance ecosystem with millions of daily USD transaction volume, billions of locked up USD, as well as a plethora of newly emerging protocols (for lending, staking, and exchanges). Because all transactions, user balances, and total value locked in DeFi are publicly readable, a natural question that arises is: how can we automatically craft profitable transactions across the intertwined DeFi platforms?In this paper, we investigate two methods that allow us to automatically create profitable DeFi trades, one well-suited to arbitrage and the other applicable to more complicated settings. We first adopt the Bellman-Ford-Moore algorithm with DeFiPoser-ARB and then create logical DeFi protocol models for a theorem prover in DeFiPoser-SMT. While DeFiPoser-ARB focuses on DeFi transactions that form a cycle and performs very well for arbitrage, DeFiPoser-SMT can detect more complicated profitable transactions. We estimate that DeFiPoser-ARB and DeFiPoser-SMT can generate an average weekly revenue of 191.48 ETH (76,592 USD) and 72.44 ETH (28,976 USD) respectively, with the highest transaction revenue being 81.31 ETH (32,524 USD) and 22.40 ETH (8,960 USD) respectively. We further show that DeFiPoser-SMT finds the known economic bZx attack from February 2020, which yields 0.48M USD. Our forensic investigations show that this opportunity existed for 69 days and could have yielded more revenue if exploited one day earlier. Our evaluation spans 150 days, given 96 DeFi protocol actions, and 25 assets.Looking beyond the financial gains mentioned above, forks deteriorate the blockchain consensus security, as they increase the risks of double-spending and selfish mining. We explore the implications of DeFiPoser-ARB and DeFiPoser-SMT on blockchain consensus. Specifically, we show that the trades identified by our tools exceed the Ethereum block reward by up to 874×. Given optimal adversarial strategies provided by a Markov Decision Process (MDP), we quantify the value threshold at which a profitable transaction qualifies as Miner Extractable Value (MEV) and would incentivize MEV-aware miners to fork the blockchain. For instance, we find that on Ethereum, a miner with a hash rate of 10% would fork the blockchain if an MEV opportunity exceeds 4× the block reward.
30
Richard Bellman · Quarterly of Applied Mathematics · 1958 · 2.7K citations · Full text
Mathematical Programming, Transport Network Analysis, Engineering +22
Making Smart Contracts Smarter
Loi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel et al. · 2016 · 2.2K citations
On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work Blockchains
Arthur Gervais, Ghassan Karame, Karl Wüst et al. · 2016 · 1.6K citations
Blockchain Consensus Protocol, Engineering, Information Security +16
SoK: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies
Joseph Bonneau, Andrew Miller, Jeremy Clark et al. · 2015 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Information propagation in the Bitcoin network
Christian Decker, Roger Wattenhofer · 2013 · 1.2K citations
Blockchain Consensus Protocol, Network Science, Engineering +15