Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: a survey

Alexandros Vassiliades, Nick Bassiliades, Theodore Patkos

The Knowledge Engineering Review · 2021 · 147 citations · 161 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Argumentation and XAI are closely linked, with argumentation offering step‑by‑step explanations, reasoning under uncertainty, and conflict resolution for AI decisions. This survey reviews methods, studies, and implementations that combine Argumentation and XAI to explain decision‑making, opinions, dialogues, and to build explainable systems across domains, including ML‑argumentation approaches for interpretable predictions. The authors present and analyze approaches that integrate Argumentation Theory with Machine Learning to produce interpretable predictive models, reviewing key methods and implementations.

Abstract

Abstract Argumentation and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) are closely related, as in the recent years, Argumentation has been used for providing Explainability to AI. Argumentation can show step by step how an AI System reaches a decision; it can provide reasoning over uncertainty and can find solutions when conflicting information is faced. In this survey, we elaborate over the topics of Argumentation and XAI combined, by reviewing all the important methods and studies, as well as implementations that use Argumentation to provide Explainability in AI. More specifically, we show how Argumentation can enable Explainability for solving various types of problems in decision-making, justification of an opinion, and dialogues. Subsequently, we elaborate on how Argumentation can help in constructing explainable systems in various applications domains, such as in Medical Informatics, Law, the Semantic Web, Security, Robotics, and some general purpose systems. Finally, we present approaches that combine Machine Learning and Argumentation Theory, toward more interpretable predictive models.

References

161