Remote Sensing · 2021 · 176 citations · 33 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringMaintenance EngineeringPavement EngineeringSensor FusionGround-penetrating RadarPavement EvaluationPavement GeotechnicsPavement MaintenancePavement Surface CharacteristicsPavement SustainabilityGround Penetrating Radar ImagingGround-penetrating Radar ProcessingGround-penetrating Radar SurveysMaintenancePavement Health MonitoringPavement InspectionPavement Surface ImagingRoad Testing
Improving detection efficiency and maintenance benefits is a major challenge in road testing and maintenance. This paper proposes combining YOLO object‑detection models with 3‑D ground‑penetrating radar images to identify internal asphalt defects and compares the maintenance benefits of traditional surface inspection versus GPR‑based detection. The method first surveys surface conditions with conventional detection, then acquires concealed defect images via GPR, applies the best‑performing YOLOv5 model for rapid defect identification, and finally evaluates maintenance benefits from economic and environmental perspectives. Results show that GPR detection lowers maintenance costs by $49,398 km⁻¹, cuts energy consumption by 792,106 MJ km⁻¹ (16.94 %) and carbon emissions by 56,289 kg km⁻¹ (16.91 %), demonstrating its effectiveness for pavement detection and maintenance.
Improving the detection efficiency and maintenance benefits is one of the greatest challenges in road testing and maintenance. To address this problem, this paper presents a method for combining the you only look once (YOLO) series with 3D ground-penetrating radar (GPR) images to recognize the internal defects in asphalt pavement and compares the effectiveness of traditional detection and GPR detection by evaluating the maintenance benefits. First, traditional detection is conducted to survey and summarize the surface conditions of tested roads, which are missing the internal information. Therefore, GPR detection is implemented to acquire the images of concealed defects. Then, the YOLOv5 model with the most even performance of the six selected models is applied to achieve the rapid identification of road defects. Finally, the benefits evaluation of maintenance programs based on these two detection methods is conducted from economic and environmental perspectives. The results demonstrate that the economic scores are improved and the maintenance cost is reduced by $49,398/km based on GPR detection; the energy consumption and carbon emissions are reduced by 792,106 MJ/km (16.94%) and 56,289 kg/km (16.91%), respectively, all of which indicates the effectiveness of 3D GPR in pavement detection and maintenance.
33
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick et al. · 2017 · 25.7K citations
YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger
Joseph Redmon, Ali Farhadi · 2017 · 19K citations
How transferable are features in deep neural networks?
Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Yoshua Bengio et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2014 · 3.5K citations · Full text
CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detection
Kaiwen Duan, Song Bai, Lingxi Xie et al. · 2019 · 3.5K citations
CrackTree: Automatic crack detection from pavement images
Qin Zou, Yu Cao, Qingquan Li et al. · Pattern Recognition Letters · 2011 · 1.1K citations