Characteristics and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational nutritional epidemiology: a cross-sectional study

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al. · PubMed · 2009 · 45.1K citations · Full text

Family Medicine, Counseling, Systematic Literature Study +16

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

David Moher · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2009 · 37.3K citations

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis

Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon G. Thompson · Statistics in Medicine · 2002 · 35.6K citations

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Gunn Elisabeth Vist et al. · BMJ · 2008 · 20.6K citations · Full text

Engineering, Education, Research Evaluation +16

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

Jonathan A C Sterne, Miguel A. Hernán, Barnaby C Reeves et al. · BMJ · 2016 · 17.4K citations · Full text