Response of maize yield and nitrogen leaching to combining controlled‐release urea and normal urea under different surface mulching

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND A one‐off application of combining controlled‐release urea (CRU) and conventional urea has been recommended for the reduction of nitrogen (N) loss and improvement of grain yield. However, the effects of combining CRU and urea with different surface mulching has not been studied in detail, and the underlying agronomical and physiological mechanisms need to be more clearly understood. RESULT A 3‐year field study was conducted to determine the effects of combining CRU and urea with different surface mulching on dry matter, N accumulation and translocation, nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 − ‐N) residuals and loss in maize grown under rain‐fed conditions. Three surface mulching [plastic film mulching (FM), straw mulching (SM) and no mulching (NM)] as well as three N fertilization [combining CRU and urea with 1:2 as the baseline application (NC), a split urea application with 4:3:3 (NU) and a N control (N0)] were used. The FM under NC fertilization increased N uptake, decreased NO 3 − ‐N residual in the deep soil layer, and decreased N loss. The FM, SM and NM under NC fertilization increased 3‐year mean grain yields by 5.8%, 4.0% and 4.6%, respectively, compared to that under NU fertilization. The FM under NC fertilization showed the highest grain yield and economic return. CONCLUSION Properly managing N application by mixing CRU and urea in a one‐off application combined with plastic film mulching may have the potential to provide a better compromise among grain yield, N loss and economic returns for maize in rain‐fed farmland. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.