Asian Journal of Law and Society · 2020 · 21 citations · 10 references
LawCloud ComputingJurisprudenceArtificial IntelligenceJudicial ReviewRulemakingArtificial Intelligence GovernanceExpert SystemsJudicial Decision-makingJudicial ReformLegal SystemsRule Of LawHuman IntelligenceInformation Technology EnablementRule-based System Of LawTrial Court Decision-makingTrial Court Processing
Abstract The singularity of artificial intelligence (AI), which transcends human intelligence to play the role of God, is imminent. In this context, the Chinese judicial system has gained some latecomer advantage, with the help of information technology, the Internet, big data, cloud computing, and AI to improve the efficiency and transparency of case handling. The trial process has undergone extensive and profound qualitative mutations. This represents a challenge to the institutional arrangements of the modern rule of law. At this stage, we should adopt a cautious and prudent attitude towards the design and application of legal-expert systems as well as machine learning. Especially from the aspect of computer sentencing, it is even more necessary to avoid a rush for quick results, and there is no need to completely exclude the judge’s discretion and free evaluation of the evidence through inner conviction. The finality of the judicial power is destined to choose a correct final solution through a debate on the survival of the fittest mechanism. In the face of such a modern rule-of-law system, big data, cloud computing, information technology, and AI are just auxiliary means to achieve legal justice. It is impossible to put the cart before the horses. This is a basic principle that we should always bear in mind.
10
The British Nationality Act as a logic program
Marek Sergot, Fariba Sadri, Robert A. Kowalski et al. · Communications of the ACM · 1986 · 555 citations · Full text