Journal of Medical Virology · 2021 · 41 citations · 18 references
Veterinary MedicineDiagnostic SciencesInfectious DiseasesDiagnostic MicrobiologyMolecular DiagnosticsVirologyInfectious Disease DetectionInfectious Disease Molecular TestingInfectious Disease ScreeningRespiratory DiseaseRespiratory InfectionsRespiratory Infectious DiseasesComparative Diagnostic PerformanceCoronavirus DiagnosticsDiagnostic Performance MetricsHigh PerformanceRapid Antigen TestingRapid Antigen TestsRapid Screening TestsSars-cov-2 Infection
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has become a major public health issue worldwide. Developing and evaluating rapid and easy-to-perform diagnostic tests is a high priority. The current study was designed to assess the diagnostic performance of an antigen-based rapid detection test (COVID-VIRO®) in a real-life setting. Two nasopharyngeal specimens of symptomatic or asymptomatic adult patients hospitalized in the Infectious Diseases Department or voluntarily accessing the COVID-19 Screening Department of the Regional Hospital of Orléans, France, were concurrently collected. The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of COVID VIRO® results were compared to those of real-time reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) results. A subset of patients underwent an additional oropharyngeal and/or saliva swab for rapid testing. A total of 121 patients confirmed to be infected and 127 patients having no evidence of recent or ongoing infection were enrolled for a total of 248 nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Overall, the COVID-VIRO® sensitivity was 96.7% (CI, 93.5%-99.9%). In asymptomatic patients, symptomatic patients having symptoms for more than 4 days and those with an RT-qPCR cycle threshold value ≥ 32, the sensitivities were 100%, 95.8%, and 91.9%, respectively. The concordance between RT-qPCR and COVID VIRO® rapid test results was 100% for the 127 patients with no SARS-CoV-2 infection. The COVID-VIRO® test had 100% specificity and sensitivity greater than 95%, which are better than the recommendations set forth by the WHO (specificity ≥ 97%-100%, sensitivity ≥ 80%). These rapid tests may be particularly useful for large-scale screening in emergency departments, low-resource settings, and airports.
18
Alexander E. Gorbalenya, Susan C. Baker, Ralph S. Baric et al. · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Emerging Infectious Diseases +12
Lorena Porte, Paulette Legarraga, Valeska Vollrath et al. · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2020 · 404 citations · Full text