Risk Parity, Maximum Diversification,and Minimum Variance: <i>An Analytic Perspective</i>

Roger Clarke, Harindra de Silva, Steven Thorley

The Journal of Portfolio Management · 2013 · 116 citations · 21 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Analytic solutions for risk‑parity, maximum‑diversification, and minimum‑variance portfolios reveal how systematic and idiosyncratic risk shape asset weights, with risk‑parity including all investable assets and idiosyncratic risk having minimal impact. The authors derive algebraic expressions for optimal asset weights that generalize properties of risk‑based portfolios, avoiding reliance on specific historical return simulations and proprietary risk models. These analytic solutions precisely show how different predicted risk components influence the relative magnitudes of security weights across the three portfolio types. Topics: portfolio construction, portfolio theory, volatility measures.

Abstract

Analytic solutions to risk parity, maximum diversification, and minimum variance portfolios provide useful perspectives about their construction and composition. Individual asset weights depend on both systematic and idiosyncratic risk in all three risk-based portfolios, but systematic risk eliminates many investable assets in long-only, constrained, maximum-diversification, and minimum-variance portfolios. On the other hand, risk-parity portfolios include all investable assets, and idiosyncratic risk has little effect on weight magnitude. The algebraic forms for optimal asset weights derived in this article yield generalizable properties of risk-based portfolios, in contrast to empirical simulations that employ a specific set of historical returns, proprietary risk models, and multiple constraints. These analytic solutions reveal precisely how various kinds of predicted risk affect the relative magnitude of security weights in each type of risk-based portfolio construction. <b>TOPICS:</b>Portfolio construction, portfolio theory, volatility measures

References

21