WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector

Chad P. Bown, Bernard Hoekman

Journal of International Economic Law · 2005 · 156 citations · 14 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Poor WTO member countries rarely engage in dispute settlement, and without systemic reform, public‑private partnerships place a heavy coordination burden on groups that could support them. The study examines how the high costs of the WTO’s extended litigation process explain the lack of developing‑country participation. The authors analyze how legal service centres, NGOs, development organisations, trade litigators, economists, consumer groups, and law schools can supply the services required at key stages of the WTO’s extended litigation process. The paper positively evaluates the current system and catalogs proposals that encourage private‑sector legal assistance for poor countries in WTO dispute settlement.

Abstract

The poorest WTO member countries almost universally fail to engage as either complainants or interested third parties in formal dispute settlement activity related to their market access interests. This paper focuses on costs of the WTO’s extended litigation process as an explanation for the potential but ‘missing’ developing country engagement. We provide a positive examination of the current system, and we catalogue and analyze a set of proposals encouraging the private sector to provide DSU-specific legal assistance to poor countries. We investigate the role of legal service centres, non-governmental organizations, development organizations, international trade litigators, economists, consumer organizations, and law schools to provide poor countries with the services needed at critical stages of the WTO’s extended litigation process. In the absence of systemic rules reform, the public-private partnership model imposes a substantial cooperation burden on such groups as they organize export interests, estimate the size of improved market access payoffs, prioritize across potential cases, engage domestic governments, prepare legal briefs, assist in evidentiary discovery, and pursue the public relations effort required to induce foreign political compliance.

References

14