medRxiv · 2021 · 11 citations · 16 references
Public HealthInfectious Disease ControlInfectious DiseasesInfection PreventionInfectious Disease EpidemiologyPediatric Infectious DiseasesCommunity-acquired InfectionsInfection SurveillanceInfectious Disease PreventionInfectious Disease SurveillanceAntibodiesCommunity Transmission ControlInfection Prevalence DynamicsPreventive Control MeasuresSars-cov-2 InfectionSchool SettingsSchool-based EpidemiologySchool-based Transmission
Abstract Background School attendance during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is intensely debated. Modelling studies suggest that school closures contribute to community transmission reduction. However, data among school-attending students and staff are scarce. In November 2020, we examined SARS-CoV-2 infections and seroreactivity in 24 randomly selected school classes and connected households in Berlin, Germany. Methods Students and school staff were examined, oro-nasopharyngeal swabs and blood samples collected, and SARS-CoV-2 infection and IgG antibodies detected by RT-PCR and ELISA. Household members performed self-swabs. Individual and institutional infection prevention and control measures were assessed. Classes with SARS-CoV-2 infection and connected household members were re-tested after one week. Findings 1119 participants were examined, including 177 primary and 175 secondary school students, 142 staff, and 625 household members. Participants reported mainly cold symptoms (19·4%). SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in eight of 24 classes affecting each 1-2 individuals. Infection prevalence was 2·7% (95%CI; 1·2 - 5·0%; 9/338), 1·4% (0·2 - 5·1%; 2/140), and 2·3% (1·3 - 3·8%; 14/611) among students, staff and household members, respectively, including quarantined persons. Six of nine infected students were asymptomatic. Prevalence increased with inconsistent facemask use in school, way to school on foot, and case-contacts outside school. IgG antibodies were detected in 2·0% (0·8 - 4·1%; 7/347), 1·4% (0·2 - 5·0%; 2/141) and 1·4% (0·6-2·7%; 8/576), respectively. For three of nine households with infection(s) detected at cross-sectional assessment, origin in school seemed possible. After one week, no school-related, secondary infections appeared in affected classes; the attack rate in connected households was 1·1%. Interpretation These data suggest that school attendance under preventive measures is feasible, provided their rigorous implementation. In balancing threats and benefits of open versus closed schools during the pandemic, parents and society need to consider possible spill-overs into their households. Deeper insight is needed into the infection risks due to being a schoolchild as compared to attending school. Funding Senate of Berlin.
16
Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19
Jan Brauner, Sören Mindermann, Mrinank Sharma et al. · Science · 2020 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Public Affairs, Health Policy, Infectious Disease Control +17